Shakespeare is far and away the most adapted writer in human
history, which makes the prospect of reviewing one of the thousand films based
on his work a little daunting. Not only that, as much as some scholars would
eagerly wish to argue, the man’s work is full of notoriously intricate language
that can prove rather difficult to read. As someone who has a serious habit of
comparing films to each other, even when it isn’t called for, how am I to know
whether or not the supposedly 'fresh' ideas presented in one adaptation haven’t
already been made cornerstones of the work previously? Is there nearly enough
time in the world for me to spool through every work just to be sure? Is it
even worth me doing so in the first place? This is where I come face-to-face with
the reason I started this blog in the first place: To learn. I have never made
any pretence about my own knowledge involving the medium: Everything I claim to
know about film, I have learnt in passing and I am by no means a definitive
voice on anything except my own personal tastes and opinions.
So, with that unnaturally heavy introduction to another one of my typically idiosyncratic and scatterbrained analyses out of the way, time to get into today’s film.
So, with that unnaturally heavy introduction to another one of my typically idiosyncratic and scatterbrained analyses out of the way, time to get into today’s film.
