Communism on film has been around for as long as film
itself. The Soviet propaganda machine, in particular the works of Sergei
Eisenstein, helped pioneer filmmaking techniques that have become commonplace
across the globe. Hell, if we’re talking honestly, Dziga Vertov’s Man With A
Movie Camera is one of the most important films in the history of the medium,
and it too wielded communist iconography to make its statements about the
potential of cinema.
I bring all this up partly so that those with knee jerk
reactions to anything regarding socialism can safely skip this and save
themselves some self-induced headaches. But also because, knowing the
ideology’s connections to the art form, it’s rather disappointing that a modern
film could depict that same ideology in quite possibly the dullest fashion
possible.
For all its pretences about espionage, tensions between the
Allies and the Axis powers, or even casual sexist condescension (because when
writing period films about women, these quips apparently need to be made by
creative law), nothing that is shown has a sense of urgency or even life to it.
Theatre director and on-again-off-again filmmaker Trevor
Nunn’s return to the director’s chair after an over-two-decade absence serves
as an example of why the man only makes a film once every 10 years at best.
It’s so sterile and washed-out in its visuals that it makes both the literal
and thematic inclusions of red nothing more than a pleasant reprieve from the blandness.
For a story this politically-charged, ‘pleasant’ shouldn’t be in the
conversation.
Considering how the discourse regarding communism vs.
capitalism has become in the social media age, I’m going to try and keep my own
personal politics out of the equation for a change. I’m not looking at this as
a chance for one ideology to be presented over another; I’m just here for an
engaging story. And that isn’t what we get. The script tries to paint some
shades of grey regarding the titular Joan’s actions, coupled with the influence
of nuclear weapons even in non-nuclear war, but by the time we get to what is
ultimately a painfully limp justification for what has been done… no cares to
be found here, sorry.
It’s an abrasively average outing that makes lip service to
asking bigger questions and making the audience question their moralities, but
through a mismatch of pacing, framing and just basic cinematic storytelling,
the biggest dilemma this film raises is whether or not it’s worth asking for a
refund.
No comments:
Post a Comment