After having quite the phenomenal year in 2019 (not to
mention knocking it out of the park more recently with Bill & Ted Face The Music), I was honestly willing to give B-movie Keanu Reeves an honest chance.
Hell, the plot for this one really intrigued my itch for sci-fi philosophising,
all about the ethics of cloning and transferring a human consciousness into another
body. Then I discovered that this is written by Chad St. John, who also gave us
the jingoistic claptrap of London Has Fallen and the entitled tedium of
Peppermint. Then I found out the director, Jeffrey Nachmanoff, is better
known for writing the glorified business expense of The Tourist, as well as
Roland Emmerich’s woefully unhelpful take on global warming with The Day After
Tomorrow. Can’t win them all, I guess.
Despite (mostly) staying away from St. John’s more
action-thriller wheelhouse, his characterisation of the lead character,
neuroscientist William, is aggravatingly similar. He has a very specific mode
when it comes to writing genre heroes, where the pain that they themselves go
through matters more than anyone else’s. No matter how much pain they choose to
inflict in turn to assuage their own, it’s all justified. And here, that manifests
in what the film proffers as its first main moral dilemma: William choosing to
bring back his family, who all died in a car accident, as biological clones.
Ignoring how wonky the film’s understanding of the mind-body
problem turns out to be, or just understanding human consciousness on its own
(“If it could speak, then it could feel” might be one of the most irritatingly reductive takes on this idea I’ve ever come across), the film’s framing is
entirely off-balance. If it was set up like a sci-fi-tinged mystery, from the
point of view of the family themselves feeling that something is wrong but
they’re not sure exactly what, the attempts at drama could’ve resulted in some
genuine moral greyness.
Instead, as we stay fixed to William’s perspective for the entirety,
the whole matter brushes off way too many of the moral and ethical
implications of the plot in favour of that entitlement I mentioned before. It
admittedly does well in making the audience feel the pain that the lead is
going through, much like Peppermint did, and Keanu even manages to do well at
selling the anguish he’s under. But when it comes down to a mangled Sophie’s
Choice in which 3 of his 4 family members he will revive (which he decides by
literally pulling names out of a hat), it drops the ball in showing the
reaction to that pain.
That disconnect between the intent and the delivery is a
major problem with the film as a whole, as the tone is quite self-serious and
morality-driven, and yet the pacing is almost slapstick in how much it hinges
on keeping conspicuously-fragile secrets from people, namely to do with the
cloning process. This partly manifests through William’s research assistant Ed
(played decently by Thomas Middleditch), who is basically the de facto comic
relief in a film that really didn’t need as much of it as he delivers,
but the plot is littered with it as well. When we get to the scene where Keanu
is masquerading as his family on social media to explain their suspicious
absence since the car crash, it really drives home how much this is meant to
appeal to his own interests, rather than those of his family.
There’s also a serious case of bad kitchen sink sci-fi here.
Even though there is more than enough stuck to the main cloning premise to fill
out a film on its own, St. John seemingly can’t help but add even more shit to
the pile, including the idea of something cloning themselves into a
robot body, body dysmorphia to do with said transfer, not to mention the finale
that devolves into standard action-thriller trappings that render any and all
ethical musings beforehand moot. Rather than cultivating a select few ideas,
they made an all-too-familiar mistake and just piled on the concepts without
really fleshing them out. And that’s without getting into the I, Robot-ass
effects work on the robot bodies, which even for a B-movie are astoundingly
subpar.
This is an absolute mess, and it might have rubbed me the
wrong way even more so than either London Has Fallen or Peppermint. It
proffers a similar unpleasantness in how much the film bends over backwards to
justify the lead’s (at best) morally-ambiguous actions, but when put in
conjunction with what we see as the family’s own reactions to that, it feels
like they tried a little too hard to brush off what should be highly complicated
ideas. It’s simplistic to the point of making this entire exercise feel
pointless and unnecessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment