My past reviews of films featuring Kristen Stewart have made
running jokes out of this, but in all honesty it’s a really good thing that the
stars of former record-holder for Biggest Godwin’s Law Breaker, Twilight, have
moved past that famed series. Anna Kendrick has become an accomplished
actor/singer thanks to films like Pitch Perfect and Into The Woods, Robert
Pattinson has done acclaimed work with visionaries like David Cronenberg, and
Kristen Stewart has come to seriously impress crowds thanks to films like Camp
X-Ray, Still Alice and American Ultra. Not only that, regular
writer of the series Melissa Rosenberg has entered into the Marvel Cinematic
fold with the web series Jessica Jones and Stephanie Meyer… has largely gone
quiet and rested on her franchise royalties, thank all things right with the
world.
[whispering from behind me, even though this is a text
review and not in any way audio/visual where this could be properly conveyed]
Wait, she wrote what?
[more inaudible whispering]
Oh, for crying out loud!
Well, point is, for the most part, they’ve largely moved on from that crater of a saga. But what about the original film’s director Catherine Hardwicke?
Well, point is, for the most part, they’ve largely moved on from that crater of a saga. But what about the original film’s director Catherine Hardwicke?
The plot: Ever since they first met as kids, Milly (Toni Collette) and Jess (Drew Barrymore) have been inseparable and always shared every experience they had, regardless of what their respective husbands (Dominic Cooper and Paddy Considine) had to say. However, once Milly is diagnosed with cancer, it seems that their perfect connection may end up getting more than a little rocky as things progress, not helped by Jess’ own stresses about starting a family.
The cast here are all really good on screen and have great
chemistry with one another. Toni Collette sells the frankly egocentric Milly
without coming across as too
insufferable; trust me, minor things like having cancer aren’t enough for
viewing audiences today to automatically sympathise with a character on screen.
The character still needs to have an element of likeability which, given how
she’s characterised for the majority of the film, is essential here and
thankfully Collette delivers. Drew Barrymore, who I honestly thought was just
going to crawl back under the woodwork after Blended last year, pretty much
shows every reason why she should be getting more work than she has of late.
Dominic Cooper, in probably his first good
performance in way too long, manages to work through the rather shaky characterisation he’s been given here; then again, he’s gone far worse with
better writing, so I’ve learnt to be thankful. Paddy Considine… okay, this is
another instance where the jokes are a little too easy to make. I mean, going from Shakespeare to a film by the
director of Twilight; careers are made from the material that provides.
Nevertheless, Considine probably comes out the best in terms of comedy, with
Barrymore coming a close second, as he delivers all of his banter and wry
dialogue with panache.
The cinematography is… iffy, to say the least. DOP Elliot
Davis brings some decent ideas every so often, like a conversation between
Milly and Jess where the camera work for Jess (on a houseboat) is stable while
Milly’s (at home) is rocking from side-to-side. I could play the obscure geek
card and claim that this is a technique ripped straight from an episode of
Urban Gothic, but instead I’ll just say that it was executed well. However,
something tells me that Davis has watched Grace Of Monaco a few too many times,
as this film has a similar issue concerning a lot of its close-ups. Namely, how
it looks like the camera is about go up the actor’s nose, almost as if the
cameraman broke the zoom function on the rig. This especially hurts during the
more dramatic moments, but then again this film has the lion’s share of issues
when it comes to its own drama.
This is a very funny script, making for nice and warm
moments between the characters; this is to be expected from someone with a
hefty background in comedy like writer Morwenna Banks. However, this marks one
of the few times when just how funny the dialogue can get ends up being a bad thing for the overall film. This
film is just too sugary for its own good, as it keeps up a mainly jovial tone
throughout the film, even during the scenes that are meant to be taken
seriously. Now, despite my glibness about the subject matter before, I want to
make this perfectly clear: Cancer is a subject that just has to be taken with an obtuse degree of seriousness if it is going
to be used at all, much like any other life-threatening medical condition.
Considering this, a decent amount of comedy is definitely needed in order to
keep the tone of the production from being too bleak for some audiences to
take.
However, this film isn’t a case of laughing in the face of the darkness; instead, it’s more like covering one’s eyes and pretending that the darkness doesn’t exist at all. No matter what is happening in any given scene, from when Milly cheats on her husband to when she gets chemotherapy, the drama is always undercut by the film’s need to constantly crack jokes, usually in the form of either Milly and/or Jess. Save for the ending, the tone is so haphazard that I’m not entirely sure how seriously to take it. Now, I completely understand that there are people out there who don’t like overly sad films. However, as much as people may argue otherwise, there still needs to be some form of reality in a film; everyone being this nonchalant about someone having cancer and possibly dying is, frankly, unrealistic to a rather insulting degree. Making jokes about big pricks when your friend is getting injected with a large needle for her chemo is the behaviour of a sociopath, not someone we should be sympathizing with. Then again, to quote one of my contemporaries, this film and reality don’t often meet.
However, this film isn’t a case of laughing in the face of the darkness; instead, it’s more like covering one’s eyes and pretending that the darkness doesn’t exist at all. No matter what is happening in any given scene, from when Milly cheats on her husband to when she gets chemotherapy, the drama is always undercut by the film’s need to constantly crack jokes, usually in the form of either Milly and/or Jess. Save for the ending, the tone is so haphazard that I’m not entirely sure how seriously to take it. Now, I completely understand that there are people out there who don’t like overly sad films. However, as much as people may argue otherwise, there still needs to be some form of reality in a film; everyone being this nonchalant about someone having cancer and possibly dying is, frankly, unrealistic to a rather insulting degree. Making jokes about big pricks when your friend is getting injected with a large needle for her chemo is the behaviour of a sociopath, not someone we should be sympathizing with. Then again, to quote one of my contemporaries, this film and reality don’t often meet.
The relationship between Milly and Jess, the core of this
entire film, feels hollow for one simple reason: No conflict. Throughout the majority
of the film, we don’t see them so much as frown at each other, even when
situations pop up that should produce at least some friction. Not to say that there isn’t any conflict at all, as
the penny is in the air for the majority of it just waiting to drop when the
two finally come to blows. Hell, this might make for the only time I actively wanted the clichéd third-act break-up to
occur just to shake things up between them. It’s more the point that it doesn’t
happen enough to make this connection feel believable; I don’t care how close
you are to anyone, no two people get
along this well. What makes this feel worse is that there is conflict elsewhere in the story: Between Milly, Jess and their
respective spouses; usually, the reasons why
they’re fighting is in response to Milly and Jess’ relationship. As much as I
hate the term ‘chick flick’ because of how it used nowadays, this is the kind of writing that
immediately comes to mind whenever that term is used: Hiding whatever ‘heavy’
emotion is building up inside until the last possible moment. That may be an
all-too-easy set-up for a sexist joke but, unlike this film, I know when to
rein it in.
All in all, this is a film that has monumental tonal issues.
The writing is rather funny in places, with some more than capable actors to
deliver it, but the overall treatment of both the main cancer plot and the
relationship between our female leads is so badly misguided that it reaches the
point where the comedy ends up serving to its detriment more than anything
else. I’m sure that there are some people out there that will find the
proceedings more emotionally fulfilling than I did (hell, I visibly saw a woman
convulsing with sobs as she watched the film), but frankly, this reaches the
levels of pandering that I have unfortunately come to expect from Catherine
Hardwicke; I eagerly await the day, if it ever comes, that she proves me wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment