Remember what I was saying at the beginning of the year
about how 2018 was the year of getting our shit together? Well, we’re barely
into March and I’m already seeing signs that that progression isn’t lasting. I
mean, nothing says "we’ve learnt nothing" more than taking one of the more
misguided releases of 2017, A Dog’s Breakfast Purpose, and deciding that
it needed not one but two follow-ups
this year. Both adapted from the writer of the original source material at
that, with the sequel to Purpose coming out later this year, and a separate
adaptation in cinemas right now. Knowing my now-prominent axe to grind when it
comes to talking animal movies, and my position that Purpose is awful in its
own special way, I can’t say I’m expecting a lot out of this one. Thankfully,
this film didn’t go below my expectations; if anything, this turned out better
than it had any right to.
Honestly, more so than Purpose, this feels more like a
once-removed attempt at a Milo & Otis-type narrative, considering the
emphasis on Bella’s connection with cats. The main difference being I'm pretty sure that the animals weren't actually put in danger to make this thing. As much as I want to rail against the
rather conspicuous CGI used to bring her bobcat companion to life… it’s a dog
going on adventures with a wildcat; I’m not that
heartless that I don’t see the cool in this premise.
It also helps that the main thing that Purpose actually had
going for it, its understanding of how animals think and behave, is here in
plentiful supply. While the narratives themselves leave a bit to be desired, W.
Bruce Cameron (author of the original book and co-writer of the script
adaptation) shows a definite connection with the viewpoint of a given dog. The
precious innocence, the understanding of the world only as it pertains to
themselves, the occasional moments of simple truths that give the non-human
outsider perspective some emotional weight; it all hits the right note, and
since the contents aren’t as drab or accidentally nightmarish as last time, we
can actually enjoy it for a change.
That might have something to do with how the relationship
between people and dogs is conveyed here, this time emphasising their use as
support animals through the inclusion of Bella’s owner’s mother, an army veteran
with undisclosed psychological issues. It definitely fits in with mainstream
America’s mild fetishisation of the military, but at least here, they’re shown
as people first that are worth taking care of when they get back home. It’s an
easy in for emotional heart-tugging, and even with the occasional
head-scratching moment (the designation of ‘pitbull’ in-film being compared to
“racism for dogs” is… certainly a thing that someone wrote down), it gives a
much more valid reason for humans and dogs to be attached to each other than
the parade of bewilderment that made up most of Purpose.
Okay, maybe I spoke too soon on the whole "we’ve learnt
nothing" thing. While I’m still not expecting A Dog’s Journey to be much better
than its predecessor, I’m at least glad that there’s a movie about doggos out
there from this year that isn’t an absolute pain to sit through. I wouldn’t
call it the most enthralling thing out there either, but as a pleasant
diversion/excuse to look at cute animals for an hour and a half, you could
certainly do a lot worse.
No comments:
Post a Comment