This is a difficult film to talk about. Productions like
this that dramatise real-life tragedies have that aspect baked into them from
the get-go, but this has inadvertently gained another layer of unpleasantness
in light of the recent mosque massacre in Christchurch. Watching a film where
Muslims are endangered by terrorists could very easily fall into the realms of
exploitation, as most thrillers with action elements tend do to by their very
nature, and considering recent events, that’s not a sensation we
particularly need right now. Thankfully, in the hands of
director/co-writer/co-editor Anthony Maras, an Aussie on his feature-length
debut, what we get is a highly visceral but still tactful recreation of the
2008 attack on the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.
For as much blood spray and frequently grisly violence takes
place, the audience isn’t expected to engage with their own bloodlust to be
invested. Rather, the main tension comes out fearing for the lives of the staff
and the guests as the terrorists lay siege to the hotel. It’s quite
nerve-racking how the individual set pieces are arranged and presented,
emphasising silence and utter dread at the proximity the characters are to
being killed. It feels like something Kathryn Bigelow would put together in how
deep-set the terror is here, and it manages to work along the same lines as
something send chills through the system.
It even manages what should be a nigh-on impossible
tightrope walk in managing to humanise the terrorists involved, yet not to the
point where we’re actively meant to feel sorry for the people ending lives.
They are presented as human beings, right down to a weirdly funny moment
between two of them involving food containing pork, and between their
lower-class surroundings and their continuous direction via the unseen Brother
Bull (or Brother Bullshit Artist as I’ve taken to calling him, because nothing
shows less respect for terrorists than responding with snark rather than fear),
they are shown as being manipulated into events through their families and
their faith, and even showing internal conflict.
Without getting into heavy spoilers, there’s a moment near
the end where one of the terrorists is confronted by a Muslim guest and, in the
space of a few moments with very little dialogue, you see the terrorist go
through an existential crisis as a result. It’s powerful stuff that helps keep
the film’s views on faith in focus, something furthered by what Dev Patel
brings to the table.
While the repeated phrase "the guest is God" amongst the
hotel staff does smell lightly of non-white servitude… it’s also a phrase that,
to anyone who has ever worked in the service sector of the workforce, will
sound familiar regardless of ethnic background. But that’s only the surface of
it: The way it gets implemented overall is as a means to highlight the
difference between the terrorists and the ones they hope to terrorise. A
comparison between using one’s faith in a god to try and protect life, and
using one’s faith as rationale to end life.
Knowing how hideously frequent it is to see moderate Muslims
being told to take responsible for the actions of extremists (usually at the
hands of Christians, if you look closely enough), this insistence on drawing a
line between them and showing what one’s servitude to a deity can do to enrich
the soul rather than simply poison it is quite gratifying, and it again helps
to make this film’s events out to be more than just watching people die for the
sake of escapist entertainment. We’re meant to care about the victims. We want
to see them survive the events, which makes it hurt that much more when we see
those who don’t survive. It’s a powerful and consistently bloody affair, but
one that keeps the audience’s empathy in the driver seat, a difficult task for
anyone let alone a first-timer.
No comments:
Post a Comment