This review is going to be quite different from what I
usually write on here. As much as I try and refrain from tooting my own horn, I
often pride myself on being able to dissect a film in real time as I’m watching
it, turning these reviews into a glimpse at how I see a given film and its
ideas. However, that only works for the films that make an immediate impact,
the ones where what is being communicated is good, clear and foreshadowed early
so I can latch onto it. Us is not that kind of movie.
Not to say that its own communication isn’t good, clear and
foreshadowed; just that, as I’m writing this, I’m still trying to figure out what the actual ideas being presented
are and what they amount to. So, as I get into this movie, know that I’m
basically showing my working in an attempt to make heads or tails of this whole
thing, so if this comes across as confused rambling, that’s only because it is.
The story itself also shows Peele continuing to build his
creative ethos, employing the same tipping-of-the-hat to the old guard of
horror cinema as he did with Get Out. There are elements of Invasion Of The
Body Snatchers to be found here in the main premise of people’s ‘shadows’
coming after them, possibly a bit of Mirrors both in the plot and in DOP Mike
Gioulakis’ frequent use of mirrors in his framing, and even Kubrick’s The
Shining with the use of large scenic shots to further push the film’s feeling
of dread. And make no mistake, while this honestly qualifies more as ‘comedy’
than Get Out erroneously did because there are moments here that are actually
funny, this is a straight-up horror flick and on that tag alone, it is highly
effective.
Now, for the attempts to dissect this thing, and I’m gonna
start with what I initially thought was going to be the message here before
getting into what I really think this
film is going for. Looking at the doppelgangers in literal terms, they are a
community of people who are revealed to have lived underground, all of whom are
immediately recognisable due to their red clothing. Honestly, at first, I
thought this was going to go into Charlottesville territory, considering the
white supremacist movement that spawned it also bred in the ideological
underground before breaking the mainstream with the Unite The Right rally, as
well as the characteristic red hats that have basically become known as the
uniform of racists in the United States (if you got a problem with that
assessment, take it up with Dave Chappelle).
But as the story goes on, it becomes a little clearer that this isn’t even going in the direction of
racial commentary. This isn’t going the same direction as Get Out did in its
targeting of well-meaning but ultimately unhelpful white liberals and their
attitudes towards African-Americans. Instead, again looking at the story
literally, it’s about a community of people who live on a lower strata to
everyone else, seeing misfortune while their others find success and happiness.
The envy of a better life is what convinces them to take to the upper ground
and make a statement that they exist, using the historic poverty protest Hands
Across America as cultural short-hand. More so than racism, this appears to be
a look at classism, something I keep
seeing being brought up by both whites and minorities as the real source of
inequality in the modern era.
This is built up by Peele’s choice of pop cultural
touchstones, beyond just the horror genre elements. Going back to the choice of
outfit for the doppelgangers, the use of a red coat and a single glove is meant
to invoke not MAGA but Michael Jackson, whom Jordan Peele himself called “the patron saint of duality”.
That fits with the main aspect of the story regarding duality and people’s
shadows. There’s also a brief gag involving OJ Simpson, whose infamous murder
trial marked a turning point in American culture in showing a black man being
given the same legal benefit of the doubt as most white men in his same tax
bracket. Once again, class over race.
Then there’s the Biblical reference at the heart of the
story, here being Jeremiah 11:11 which serves as a major leitmotif in the
narrative. The passage essentially goes “Therefore this is what the Lord says:
‘I will bring on them a disaster that they cannot escape. Although they cry out
to me, I will not listen to them’” In context, this passage refers to the
worshipping of false idols or, where this film is concerned, false images.
Images like integrating one’s self into upper-middle class society, a position
historically preserved by whites, while the lower class is stuck in huddled,
cramped spaces and largely ignored by the masses.
It could be warning of a violent uprising of the poor over
the rich… but look again at the main plot. People are being attacked by those
who are themselves, sharing body and soul in a literal sense as hinted at in
the dialogue proper. It pushes the fear of the Other mentality that likely
influences a lot of the societal schisms I’ve gotten into so far, and reaches a
pretty chilling conclusion: We are
the Other, and they are Us. We are
our own worst enemy, and fighting with ourselves is only making things worse
for everyone. And as shown on-screen, that fight isn’t restricted by race; everyone has that shadow.
So, yeah, even looking at this on a surface level, there’s a
lot to unwrap here. I honestly don’t know how accurate any of this analysis
really is, but that’s ultimately not even the important part. No, that is
whether or not this film is worth this much navel-gazing to parse through what
is being presented. As I’ve said before, a mystery isn’t that good if people
aren’t in some way compelled to solve it out of a sense of personal curiosity.
Me personally, considering how well this film works on a purely visceral level,
it made me want to figure it out. Whether I’ve even gotten close to that
remains to be seen, but for what it’s worth, this is a film worth checking out.
I can’t guarantee that you’ll “get” it, but if you’re willing to be tested by
cinema, you’ll certainly get your money’s worth from the experience. Just…
expect some confused conversation as you leave the cinema.
No comments:
Post a Comment