This film has no credited director. No, this hasn’t
confirmed everyone’s suspicions that computers are now making films all on
their own, nor is this a situation where the director disowned the production
for one reason or another. In reality, it seems like the production disowned
the director, citing "multiple complains of 'inappropriate and unwanted
behaviour'" for him being fired in January 2018, after the majority of the film
was already completed. While someone with Weinstein tendencies helming a
children’s film is dicey to say the least, I will give some credit to Paramount
and Nickelodeon for booting his credit from the film, while still releasing it
so everyone else’s hard work didn’t go to waste. It also helps that this film
is certainly better than I would’ve expected from that kind of production
drama.
From the flying fish carousel to the numerous rollercoasters
to the surprisingly creepy chimpanzombies (being able to write words like that
makes my job just that much more fun), it’s a set piece-heavy flick where the
set pieces themselves feel like we’re experiencing the fun of the park for
ourselves. It’s the least a film like this should offer.
The characters, though? Well, not to say that they’re
outright terrible but they are still quite bland. It’s a definite and
unfortunate case of one gimmick per character (or, in the case of the beaver
brothers, one gimmick per duo), making for the bare minimum of memorability: A
blue bear with narcolepsy, a safety officer who is a walking safety hazard, and
a boar who gets relegated to de facto leader/love interest… ugh.
This isn’t helped by the sense of humour on display, which I
would hesitate to call unfunny as much as barely any of the jokes even register
as such. Being stuck with the voices of radio duo Fitzy and Wippa for the
Australian release might have something to do with that, but mostly, it just
feels like the production is leaning on the visuals for its engagement. Credit
to them, that was a good call, but it leaves the people on-screen feeling
pointless… or, at least, most of them do.
I haven’t brought up the main character in all this, June
played by newcomer Brianna Denski, and that’s because I wanted to save the best
for last. While the events in the park itself feel surface-level, our
introduction to June, her parents and their connection to the park gets close
to Pixar’s Up territory in being able to deliver some pretty harsh emotionality
with very few words or specifics. It also adds some subtle textures to the
latter scenes involving ‘the darkness’, the inside of which looks like the
contents of a cardboard box. Have to admit, that was a nice touch.
At its heart, this is a story about imagination, creative
expression and how the harshness of reality can get in the way of it. While
this script certainly deserves credit for how it treats the finale, which
manages to avoid the ‘the evil is gone forever’ cliché for something
startlingly more realistic, it primarily wins points because, for a film all
about whimsy, it can get rather touching in places. Bonus points for not
completely spelling out the parallels between June and Peanut the monkey,
allowing the audience to put the admittedly-obvious pieces together for
themselves. You know you’ve seen too many crappy kids’ films when you’re
thankful for one that doesn’t hold the audience’s hand the entire time.
This film is a very mixed bag, with solid animation, creative
set pieces and even some genuine heart, but hindered by a pretty lacklustre
story, limp acting and practically non-existent humour. It’s light
entertainment in the more disheartening sense, and I still have reservations
about the formerly-known-as-the-director’s jackassery behind the scenes, but
I’ll admit that I had fun with this.
No comments:
Post a Comment