The more recent trend of female-dominated crime capers has
brought some solid efforts (Ocean’s 8), some mild disappointments (Widows) and
some woefully misjudged disasters (The Kitchen). While it’s certainly good to
see some much-needed variety at the cinema, I wouldn’t say that there’s been a
film yet in this subset that has outright demanded my attention. Maybe it’s
because the crop so far has remained rather indebted to the ways of men in
their narratives and even their production background, or maybe it’s just that
I haven’t found one that aligns with my tastes just yet, but this is a sector
of the market that’s been waiting for an outright stunner to make the point for
the rest. Enter Hustlers, exactly what the doctor ordered.
Add in Keke Palmer, Riverdale’s Lili Reinhart and Lizzo (with
flute in tow), and you’ve got a collective that brings an amazingly warm and
inviting atmosphere to the first act. I mean, beyond just the fact that there’s
a lot of eye candy going around, and Lopez actually doing her own dancing helps
to highlight that, yes, pole-dancing is actually pretty damn strenuous.
From there, the film takes a Goodfellas-by-way-of-Magic-Mike
approach to its depiction of not only their criminal hustle, but of the
stripping trade as a whole. Aided by the fact that this is one of those rare
films about strippers nowadays where they actually strip on-camera, the overt
lack of male gaze in its framing is quite refreshing. It’s a business same as
any other, with its socioeconomics and methodology, all of which are shown
without dipping too far into the exploitative (unless there’s good reason to do
so) or even into the vulgar. It’s quite… rousing, at least to begin with, and
it certainly shows the allure of the business.
And then we get to 2008, one of the worst years for American
business and one that hits the strip club harder than most, given their mostly
Wall Street clientele. What starts out as a rather inviting vibe turns dark
really damn quick, highlighting how badly the working conditions tanked along
with the rest of the economy and that their one main goal, to make it on their
own, became more and more of a stretch to accomplish. It’s this that ultimately
gives way to the crime aspect of the story, with the girls deciding to fleece
their marks through a combination of good scheduling and an understanding of
chemistry (i.e. the ratio of ketamine/MDMA they spike their marks’ drinks
with).
While it follows a certain pattern akin to a lot of crime
dramas, from the euphoria of success to the inner workings of the hustle to the
eventual collapse and law involvement, it stands out in a pretty major way. Or,
at the very least, it stands out against what this film so easily could have settled
for. With the majority of the people getting swindled being shown as Wall
Street residents, the kind of people who bleed others for their wallets, in
addition to the backdrop of the Global Financial Crisis, the argument could be
made that they’re taking out worthy victims. They even make it a point to show
Wu’s Destiny taking a bizarrely Temple Grendin approach to the hustle, in that
she tries to do a rather inhumane thing in the most humane way possible re: the
drug doses.
But that would be too easy. Simply making out the girls to
be the good guys because they’re squeezing stock traders and CEOs of their
ill-gotten gains would arguably have been apt for the current social climate,
but that’s not what we get. Instead, through the eyes of Destiny, we get
something far more explicitly amoral, encapsulated by her describing what they
did as “hurt people hurt people”. Rather than going for easy points, it instead
goes for something a bit more grounded, a bit more realistic and, quite
frankly, a lot more engaging in the process.
That’s why I consider this to be the best production
within this trend so far. Aside from managing to deliver solid drama within the
traditional framework, aided by some fantastic performances and music
selections, it actively subverts that same framework in a number of ways, not
the least of which being that it doesn’t shy away from the ambiguity of the
characters’ actions. It so easily could have taken the anti-hero route with
this, and I might have even agreed with the sentiment, but by treating the
subject matter with more care and honesty than that, I actually respect this
film a whole lot more than I already would have.
No comments:
Post a Comment