Richard Linklater has a real fascination with using cinema
to capture life’s little moments as they happen. This will come as zero shock
to those who witnessed the media hypestorm surrounding Boyhood a few years
back, but a lot of his oeuvre shows this in one way or another. Whether
it’s musing on bygone days, focusing on a single character’s need to break out
of those bygone days, or literally following the same characters/cast over
several in-real-time years to bridge reality and cinema closer, it’s an aesthetic
that has led to some great work. With his latest, though, I find myself
questioning whether this particular moment was worth making holy.
Said behaviour is shown, in quite unnerving fashion, to be
the result of Bernadette’s lack of artistic activity. Stagnation that gave way
to a form of contempt against… pretty much everyone and everything,
herself included. It’s an interesting approach to her architectural profession,
and a sentiment that is very relatable these days, but where it really
hits home is how it aligns with her psychological state, both as her own person
and as a mother.
It feels like a natural extension to Patricia Arquette’s
show-stealing monologue in Boyhood, crystalising the adjustment mothers make to
be caregivers and how it can feel like being robbed of your own personage. It’s
because of this that the scenes between Blanchett and newcomer Emma Nelson as
her daughter Bee are so damn effecting… that, and having a whole scene devoted
to yelling at Kristen Wiig helps too.
And on that note, we get into the entertainment value… and
outside of Blanchett, it’s honestly pretty dry. Not even dry humour, just… dry.
As a mystery, the title comes across like an absurdist joke since Bernadette
never leaves the film’s focus and takes up most of the screen-time. Hell, her
disappearance itself, the result of a pretty major emotional breakdown, feels a
bit thrown together once we get to it. Along with the entire third act wrapped
around it. And as comedy-drama… well, it got the latter part down, but it only
ends up tickling the notion of actually laughing at what’s going on, like all
the personnel on an Antarctic science station who took up different trades just
so they could be there, but it never ends up connecting as it should.
As a character study about a working mother, this is
remarkably engaging and complex in how it details what makes her tick,
amplified exponentially by Blanchett’s performance. As a look at where
motherhood, mental health, and artistic expression intersect and influence each
other, it definitely appeals to the part of me that’s fascinated by artists
describing other artists. But that might go to explain why Blanchett herself
takes up so much space in the narrative, as anything that isn’t her (both
in-front of and behind the camera) ends up dragging to a rather disappointing
degree. It’s genuinely bizarre to see a film that is anchored by a performance this
fucking good, and yet still feel quite underwhelmed by the whole thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment