
While I have talked at length before about the nebulous
concept of 'Oscar bait', and how this time of year just before the Oscars is
usually the big dumping ground for its ilk around here, I fear I may have
misrepresented it just a touch. I have usually attributed that term to what
most people consider to be prestige pictures: Period pieces usually dealing
with the important social issue of the day; bonus points if it’s set during
World War II and/or involves Nazis.
Well, only recently by my own admission, I
have realised that there is another type of Oscar bait out there: The
over-conceptualised, over-cooked 'thought experiments' that are meant to be
challenging but, more times than not, usually end up getting slapped with the
'pretentious' label whether it’s warranted or not. It’s the kind of space that
arthouse hacks like Malick occupy. Yeah, I more than acknowledge that I may be
in the minority on this, but I will not
submit when it comes to how much the Academy unconditionally loves that guy and
work that feels even remotely like his. Not to say that the hyper-intellectual type of Oscar
bait is inherently bad; after all, Academy favourite Charlie Kaufman well and
truly fills that gap and he is easily one of the most fascinating, if not always
coherent, cinematic minds still working today. Yeah, time to actually put on
that film snob hat for once; would be a shame if I didn’t wear it even once.