The plot: Billy Lynn (Joe Alwyn) is a young soldier returning home from fighting in the Iraq War, with him and the rest of his team are being celebrated as heroes. While on a promotional tour of the U.S., up to and including being part of the halftime show at a Dallas football game, he reflects back on his time reconnecting with his family and his time on the battlefield, and begins to question whether or not he wishes to return to the front line.
Is this just the year of surprising cast lists in war films?
Because here’s another one full of actors who are either known for fairly
recent and audience-annoying productions, or just haven’t acted on film before.
The latter is only really true for the lead actor Alwyn, but that’s only
because this guy is clearly trained more in theatrical acting than cinematic
acting. He has a very calculated but natural approach to blocking where his
actions often speak louder than the few lines of dialogue he’s given, which
helps because his dialogue isn’t that insightful to begin with. Apart from him,
we have Kristen Stewart in one of her weaker performances in a while, Chris
Tucker still managing to not be annoying, Garrett Hedlund reminding us that his
career didn’t immediately die after Pan ( nor should it have; he’s actually
pretty good in this as Lynn’s commanding officer) and Steve Martin… you know,
after Home, I should be thankful that this guy is still in theatrical releases
at all, but man oh man, this guy has not been doing well in terms of
filmography for a very long time now.
With war films or just films set during war time being the
go-to when it comes to Oscar season (now I’m remembering why I was dreading
this time of year so damn much), it helps that this film definitely has a
different intent to what else we’ve seen in the last twelve months.
Specifically, this is meant to look at how the media and the public perceive
the military and their actions, as opposed to the reality of their work. Given
how the story is built around the “now” taking place in the middle of a big publicity
tour, it has a good setup for contrasts between the two mindsets. This ends up
manifesting itself in Billy’s own headspace, as there’s a well-handled scene of
him and the others at a press conference where we see what Billy thinks they say to answer questions,
followed by what they actually say. Honestly, I wish that the entire film was
conveyed in this manner, as in terms of showing that disconnect, that one scene
was probably the most effective towards that end. The rest of the film? Not so
much.
For the most part, the commentary just ends up falling flat
on its face, mainly because of its main intent with showing that cultural
disconnect. This film sees the rest of the world as over-glamorising what is
ultimately incredibly harrowing work, failing to realise the actual dangers
that they go through. Unfortunately, even considering how recently this story
started kicking around (the original book was published in early 2012), this
has a pretty outdated attitude when it comes to how cinema specifically depicts
the troops. I specify cinema because there’s a running gag in the film
involving Tucker as an agent trying to sort out their movie deal, meaning that
we get plenty of hi-larious meta-jokes about wanting to be in a film while they
are in the process of being in a film. Tucker himself isn’t annoying, but his
dialogue sure is. However, more than anything, this commentary just doesn’t
work because the mindset it’s trying to critique? Cinema hasn’t done that for a
while now. Hell, the majority of films over the last few years involving the
troops have largely taken the sympathetic route in portraying like with HacksawRidge.
This isn’t helped by how, for a film wanting to satirise the
fictional view of the U.S. military, the story itself is completely fictional.
Normally, I wouldn’t have as much of a gripe with this as I do, but when you
have an entire scene dedicated to the troops sharing a stage with Destiny’s
Child (or painfully obvious Destiny’s Child stand-ins) and the only legitimate
reason for this to be here is if this actually happened and they are trying to
adhere to reality as much as possible, yeah, it’s going to bother me. In much
the same way that, for a film poking fun at “movie moments”, this film being
about as Hollywood sheen as a war film can get. Any of the conversations
involving Billy and his possible girlfriend Faison (yeah, pointing out how
silly the name is doesn’t make it any less so) are filled with these saccharine
platitudes and dialogue that no living human has ever uttered in real life. I’d
call it trying to have their cake and eat it too, except said cake isn’t that
fulfilling to begin with.
All in all, this isn’t satire; this is the military
needlessly talking down to the audience. I can’t speak for the quality of the
original novel, as I haven’t read it, but I don’t need to read it to know that this film is way too clean and way too
sappy for any of its points to have any impact. This isn’t helped by how its
main point of discussion is a moot point by this rate, since filmmakers are
more than willing to show sympathy for the average soldier. I understand that
prejudice against the troops is a real problem, but quite frankly, I don’t see
this changing any of that.
No comments:
Post a Comment