One of the oldest tropes in romantic comedy is the idea of
mismatching someone conventionally attractive with someone unconventionally
attractive. If you’ve seen any movie or any sitcom in the last handful of
decades, you’ve seen this in action. It usually takes the form of a schlubby
guy who is either going out with or is married to a beautiful woman, with the
internal joke being the audience questioning how he got her.
And speaking of the main couple, this is a pairing that is
supposed to sound odd on paper but work really well in practice… except the
casting here is a little too good.
Rogen’s brand of stoner champion has always had a lovable affability to it, and after seeing Theron play the epitome of the
modern mother in Tully, her as the driven but overworked Secretary of State is
an unsurprisingly good fit. To say nothing of their chemistry together, which
is so warm and natural and weirdly realistic that the casting becomes an
afterthought after a while. It gets the crucial heart of the story down, which
is good because the rest of it is an uphill struggle.
Along with being a seemingly-standard rom-com, this also
doubles as a political satire. It literally opens on white nationalists, so
let’s be clear about how prevalent this is. With a script half-done by Dan
Sterling, whose last attempt at political comedy turned out less-than-ideal
back with The Interview, this could’ve turned out a bit dicey… were it not for
the other half being done by Liz Hannah, co-writer of The Post.
That kind of experience with delivering real-world shit
comes in very handy here, as the political barbs thrown are quite accurate
without becoming too much of a caricature. I mean, the sitting President here
(played by Bob Odenkirk) is a former TV star who has ties to a media
conglomerate run by Gollum. No prizes for guessing the target here, and I’m dead
serious about the Gollum comparison, since Andy Serkis does a brilliant job as
the twisted media mogul Parker Wembley.
But that’s fairly basic by this point, seeing a film from
left-leaning creatives that acts almost like an alternate reality fantasy about
what it would be like if Hillary had won the 2016 election. It may feel
relevant, but it’s not exactly new ground. What is new ground, quite frankly, is where the film takes its political
scalpel. It establishes Theron’s Charlotte as part of the bigger rat race,
fighting to make her mark on issues that she cares about, but in anything
political, no change comes without compromise. Here is where things get real,
so strap in.
Now, with how didactic I can get in these reviews, I know
full well that I’m not the best person to be talking about this. But if we were
to sideline every argument made on grounds of hypocrisy, literally nothing
would ever get said, let alone done. What this film boils down to, keeping the
Trump/Hillary stand-ins in mind, is the need for bipartisanship. Or, more
specifically, for leftists to be a little more open to working with those on
the right. Politics may govern how the world runs (as much as we may wish
otherwise), but it’s not exactly the best foundation for friendships. Or relationships.
Or any real long-standing connection between two people. If we are only able to
work with people we 100% agree on, I hope you like standing in front of the
mirror for ours because that’s the only practical way that’s going to happen.
Seth Rogen’s Fred doesn’t get that. He’s the kind of
hard-line idealist that can only see things one particular way, and
compromising that perspective is out of the question. But compromise is an
inevitable thing and sometimes needs to be done, something he learns through
one of the least boring Third-Act Break-Ups I think I’ve ever covered on this
blog.
It’s a refrain I keep seeing (usually from conservatives,
admittedly) that the left has become so forthright in their views that they are
turning into their own brand of fascism. I would normally disregard that
nonsense immediately but… well, I won’t get into spoilers, but it’s not every
day that a character’s tattoo ends up showing their own development as a
character. It’s such a weirdly subtle, and yet incredibly blunt, method of
illustrating this idea that the fact I’m even having to think about it rationally
means that these guys might actually be onto something. I mean, the dictionary
definition of a bigot is being intolerant to people who hold different
opinions, and that is what Fred is.
And yet, even with all that political musing and
examination, this doesn’t feel like it’s shoving anything down our throats.
Because the core romance is so on-point, and because the political remarks are
grounded in tangible reality, they mesh together to make for a remarkably
breezy offering that just happens to have some really cool ideas at its core.
As someone who does tend to rant and rave about certain political issues, and
who is also growing tired of the constant back-and-forth, I felt like I needed
this in my media diet, if for no other reason than to make me stop being so
hard-line about certain things. It being funny as fuck and grin-inducingly cute
is just icing on the cake for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment