Rambo is one of the most classic action franchises of all
time. It is seriously weird thinking about just how influential the first two
entries are, setting the tone for a lot of action cinema to come out of
post-Vietnam America. The first remains one of the most brutal depictions of
PTSD to make it to the big screen, and the second basically set the blueprint
for every jungle-set military action-thriller to come after, up to and
including the also-highly-influential Predator.
The third film… exists, and even as someone who takes pride
in recollecting pop culture minutiae, I can barely remember anything about it.
Then there was Rambo ’08, which boosted the gore standard in a way that, given
what it was depicting, must’ve hit close to home considering it went on to
inspire real-life Burmese freedom fighters. Following any of that up was gonna
be a hard ask, and what we get here is… complicated.
But quite frankly, that ends up being a minor point next to
something a lot more structurally wrong with this. This is the story of a
former soldier who gets dragged back into his old ways in order to save a
family member from sex traffickers. We sure this wasn’t originally meant to be
a Liam Neeson film? That combined with the finale, which takes the
trap-building from First Blood and turns it into an R-rated Goonies sequel
(complete with being set in an elaborate system of underground caves, the
existence of which is scarcely justified), gives this an uncomfortable feeling
that we’ve gone from leading the pack to following the leader. A leader that
stopped marching years ago but these dudes hadn’t noticed.
Said uncomfortable feeling could also be a by-product of how
graphic the violence is here, which eventually reaches a point where it’s so
gory that it mimics an Itchy & Scratchy cartoon, but that isn’t much of an
issue here. Rambo ’08 was far worse than this in terms of blood and guts, and
with the authoritarian regime doing most of the bloodletting, it made sense to
be that confronting. Here? Not only is it gratuitous seemingly for its own
sake, it’s also lit, shot and edited so wonkily that it can be difficult to
even make out what’s going on
.
But even with all that said, I do have to give this film a
major point in its favour: John Rambo’s character is intact. Stallone’s
performance and co-writing here holds onto his place as a former soldier for
whom the war keeps replaying in his head, giving the character a sense of
weight and emotional heft that anchors a lot of the film’s weirder moments,
like when they rehash the ‘we should kill this guy, but let’s keep him alive
because the plot needs us to’ cliché.
It also helps that the depiction of PTSD, along with a later
showing of grief, end up melding together to highlight the notion of certain
events that are so horrific to witness that, even long after the moment has
passed, they continue to be witnessed and agonised over. It’s one of the better
examples of trauma in a mainstream film that I’ve seen in a very long
time.
What results from all of this is a film where I genuinely
hope it really is the end of this franchise. As much as Stallone is still able
to deliver as a lead actor, he still feels like he’s in a film that got hastily
rewritten to be a Rambo movie, given how much of it reeks of borrowed material.
This series has devolved from one of the most influential of all time to
blindly chasing trends years after they were declared unnecessary and that,
more than anything to do with racism or excessive violence, is what annoys me
about this thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment