John Shaft, the man who built the foundation on which the
blaxploitation genre would be built, has had a weird after-life. From the two
Richard Roundtree-starring sequels to the classic original, to the 2000
sequel/reboot with Samuel L. Jackson, to today’s film which serves as yet
another sequel and another quasi-reboot. The original is a pretty solid
effort with an all-time greatest soundtrack, and the 2000 reboot was a bit
muddled but still quite entertaining, so maybe this one will turn out alright.
Well, considering all three films have the exact same name, let it be known
that the confusion with this mess only starts from there.
So, this is a sequel to the 2000 version, with Jessie T.
Usher starring as Sam Jackson’s son and Roundtree’s grandson (yeah, they retcon
where he was actually the uncle of the lead in Shaft 2000, but again, the
confusion isn’t over yet). It opens in 1989 with Sam’s Shaft, showing the
preceding years (including the ones that Shaft 2000 took place in) with him
sending increasingly prop-comic Christmas gifts to his son. Considering this
basically embeds Shaft 2000 as being a dead-beat dad into a film that didn’t
need that kind of addition, all without yet actually starting the main
plot of this film, I should be more annoyed by that. Then again, I’m too busy
being annoyed by how this is time-travel-levels of fucking up with temporal
storytelling and it ain’t even a sci-fi flick.
That would have been easy enough to overlook, though, had
this film gotten the core of the Shaft franchise right from the off. Not what
we get here, unfortunately. Where Shaft 2000 rebooted the series by updating
the original formula for the styles and tastes of the time, this film is far
more interested in laying bare that formula and poking fun at it, usually in the
form of Usher’s JJ deconstructing Jackson’s version and his mannerisms.
Except these aren’t even the same mannerisms as we saw
before, as Shaft 2000 showed an actual sense of humanity in the character, like
his genuine empathy when hearing Diane Palmieri’s side of the story. Here, he’s
introduced with a goatee covered in body glitter and he spends most of the film
either trying to pull or getting berated by his wife and/or son because
hypocrisy is apparently hilarious. It’s like the only part of Shaft 2000 that
the writers even looked at was the oversexed opening credits, and they just
assumed that’s all his character was.
And then there’s the comedy… and quite frankly, the fact
that that is the genre this falls into is a pretty major misstep. The
films that made the name Shaft part of pop culture were relatively grounded
works, with Roundtree’s version being a neo-noir crime flick that feels like it
was from the era of Dirty Harry (predated that film by several months,
actually, but same ballpark) and Jackson’s was an action-thriller that fit in
with the late-90’s landscape. Here, we’ve basically devolved into self-parody,
with some particularly painful call backs to the previous films. They even do
the “they say he’s a bad mother… shut your mouth!” bit, a quip that would have
been tacky in Shaft 2000, let alone a film 19 years later.
Even on its own merits, the comedy in this thing is weak as
fuck. It tries to do what Shaft 2000 did in updating the story for a modern
audience, but all that really amounted to was Sam Jackson making some jokes
about heteronormativity and JJ’s boss listing his worries as ‘the opioid
epidemic and a young daughter who wants to be called Frank’. It’s like watching
a Dave Chappelle Netflix special, except it’s far too lame to be anything close
to offensive, and it’s too trite to be anything close to funny. And since this
is what the script is banking on, save for an admittedly decent villain lair
shootout with Richard Roundtree in tow (in his own words, “man’s still got
it”), it makes the bulk of the production quite eyeroll-worthy.
Knowing how bad blaxploitation remakes can be nowadays,
given what happened with Superfly, and how bad director Tim Story has
been lately with the Ride Along films, I’ll admit that this isn’t as bad
as I was expecting. It has a couple decent jokes, the performances are alright
and I can get how this would be Shaft in the 2010’s, given the face of
action-comedies nowadays. However, this also makes for the least interesting
entry in the series so far, a pretty bad sign when said entry shares its entire
name with two far superior films. Anyone who’s been keeping track of how many
times I’ve used the name ‘Shaft’ in this review will have some idea how
needlessly confusing this whole thing is, and it’s not even centred around a
movie worth the headaches.
No comments:
Post a Comment