The plot: Una (Rooney Mara) tracks down Ray (Ben Mendelsohn)
to his workplace. As they talk, they discuss their past history together, how
their lives turned out since they last spoke, and how Ray was in a sexual
relationship with Una when she was only 13 years old. However, whatever Una’s
reasons for wanting to see Ray again, it seems that she is driven by more than
just anger.
Slowly but surely, Ben Mendelsohn has gone from being one of
the unsung heroes of the Australian New Wave into a prominent figure in
Hollywood. The man has worked with the likes of Ridley Scott and Christopher
Nolan and he even landed a role as a literal Star Wars villain; he knows how to
play the antagonist. That amount of experience serves him uncomfortably well
here, echoing very real and very unsettling attempts to justify his actions,
and the fact that his chemistry with Mara is as natural as it is just makes
what he is saying and how he delivers it that much more impactful.
Mara, on the
other hand, is given a role that is even more complex. The character of Una
spends most of the story juggling a lot of conflicting and heavy emotions
connected to Ray, something that very easily could have fallen into the realms
of unwitting exploitation. Mara is frighteningly good here, managing to weave
through the character specifics she’s given while giving the role an unwavering
sense of loss and even desperation. Again, her chemistry with Mendelsohn ends
up making the cold hard facts of them both hit that much harder. Ruby Stokes as
the younger Una is effective to the point of being genuinely uncomfortable to
watch on screen, even more so than the leads, and Riz Ahmed as one of “Pete’s”
co-workers brings some subtler points to the table in terms of the effects of
toxic masculinity.
At face value, the story concept has an element of revenge embedded into it. A victim directly confronting their abuser and making them
face their actions is something that has been dallied around in the realms of
revenge thrillers for a very long time by this point. However, that is far too
simple, at least for this story. It does delve into feelings of anger and
resentment, but it also explores notions of abandonment, inner conflict and…
love. As we see Una and Ray interact and reminisce about their history, it
comes across less like real confrontation and more like two old friends
remembering the good old days. To say that this is uncomfortable to sit through
might be the single greatest understatement of the year.
Between the talented
actors, the frequently harsh lighting, the sterile and unnerving camera work
and framing by cinematographer Thimios Bakatakis, and the quietly pulsing and
grinding soundtrack from Jed Kurzel, this film makes two people just talking to
each other feel like the most terrifying thing that could possibly be
happening. Mainly because, as more specifics are revealed, it pretty much is.
However, it’s not purely because of the specific actions
made. Sure, Ray’s behaviour and attitude towards the younger Una are certainly
nauseating, but that’s not what makes this so damn petrifying. Instead, it’s
because of the resulting reactions
and how complex they are on a psychological level. Una may be angry at Ray for
what he did, but she’s also regretful that they didn’t go ahead with their plan
to run away together, disconnected from the rest of the world, and even looks
back at what Ray did to her with a certain level of nostalgia. They even share
a laugh or two while reminiscing, and just typing that fills me with an urge to
scrub my skin until it goes bright pink.
But here’s the thing: Along with
showing that a lot of powerful people have used that power for incredibly dehumanising means, 2017 has also shown a break in the usual silence that surrounds
these stories. The human mind isn’t equipped to deal with something this
traumatic, and when the brain can’t process something, it will likely just
suppress rather than attempt to deal with it. People speaking out against
abusers of this type takes a lot of courage to do, both because of how society
tends to give male aggressors the benefit of the doubt and because that kind of
power dynamic can truly twist a person’s understanding of what normal human
interaction is. And that, in no uncertain terms, is what has happened to Una in
the wake of her abuse.
The literal first thing Ray says to Una as a child is that
she should be smiling, since it’s such a lovely day and all. Later on in the
film, Riz Ahmed’s Scott tries to make Una leave a party at Ray’s house,
something that she doesn’t do willingly. I bring both of these up because part
of what makes Una’s character so heartbreaking is that her actions end up being
largely informed by the male influences in her life, both short-term and
long-term. Scenes of her at home with her parents show said parents fighting,
with her father literally punching into a wall in his anger. This might go on
to explain why she ended up clinging to Ray as closely as she did, seeing him
as the only man in her life that actually loved her. This is incredibly twisted
reasoning by design and it shows the lingering effects that this kind of abuse
can leave on a person. She has genuine love for Ray, something that
unconsciously sickens her, and even though she has a certain degree of
recognition that what he did was wrong, her main regret is that it didn’t
continue. That her love for him wasn’t reciprocated. That the absence of him in
her life lead her to frequent one-night-stands at clubs as an adult.
As much as
promiscuity tends to be linked to parental issues and sexual trauma by armchair
psychologists, these things aren’t presented as if this is the only outcome. It
merely presents all of this as a very probable possibility in response to such
treatment. With the year we’ve had since this film’s initial release, and the
fact that cries of “Well, why didn’t you report this sooner?” or “Oh, they’re
just saying this to get attention” or even “Leave it for the courts to decide”
are still going on right now in response to recent accusations, this film’s
admittance of how these situations aren’t as cut-and-dry as they may appear is
incredibly vital.
All in all, this might the roughest sit I’ve had all year,
if not since I started this blog to begin with. With incredibly powerful
acting, a keen cinematic eye that manages to transcend the film’s origins as a
stage play, and writing that unearths unnerving but necessary truths about the
open wounds created by sexually abusive relationships, particularly those
involving children, this is the kind of cinema that is to be entered into with
caution.
I’d honestly recommend avoiding this thing altogether, as I will
admit to being profoundly disturbed by what I just watched. However, victim-blaming
and flagrant hand-waving of real-world accusations of sexual abuse have been
rather prominent this year. This film showing an example of such a scenario in
all its unnerving psychological detail highlights not only the damage caused by
such abusers but also how that damage can warp a person’s perspective of that
person. When someone does something this horrible to another human being,
anything from fear to denial to mistaken feelings of affection to any
combination of the three can make what seems like the easy choice from the
outside feel all-too-distant. It illustrates in truly heartbreaking fashion how
the scars formed by such actions are not only deep, but affecting in ways that
aren’t immediately obvious. I won’t pretend to know what that kind of trauma
feels like from a perspective of personal experience… but after watching this,
I feel I at least have some kind of foundation from which I can begin to
understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment