Every so often, the Hollywood scheduling system looks at the
crap that gets screened and bestows a boon on the viewing public with a double
feature from an acclaimed director. 2013 was an amazing year in this regard as
we got not only two releases from David O. Russell with Silver Linings Playbook
and American Hustle, but also the ‘supposedly’ final two theatrical releases
from Steven Soderbergh with Side Effects and Behind The Candelabra. But then,
there are times when the scheduling results in a dual release from a… less
reputable director. This is unfortunately a latter case as we are discussing
another film by Eli Roth. I once again don’t want to completely badmouth his
abilities as a director, as the guy definitely has talent in certain areas.
However, his insistence on filming his own scripts is his biggest flaw; the guy
has character sensibilities that make Mark Renton look like Oskar Schindler.
For as much credit as I was willing to give his last film, it still makes me
feel slightly ill thinking back on it. So, is this film as bad as that… or is it,
by some terrifying miracle, even worse?
The plot: Married architect Evan (Keanu Reeves) is home alone while his wife (Ignacia Allamand) and children are on a family vacation that Evan couldn’t make it to because of a shoulder injury. That night, two girls Genesis (Lorenza Izzo) and Bel (Ana de Armas) arrive at his front door to seek shelter from the weather outside. Once inside, they proceed to seduce Evan who, despite his best attempts, succumbs to their charms. However, as their stay is prolonged further and further, it seems that the girls have something far more sinister in store for him.
I still concur that Keanu Reeves doesn’t get nearly as much
recognition for his acting as he should; hell, how much everyone loved John
Wick is proof positive that he isn’t as bad as the world has made him out to
be. Unfortunately, this isn’t a good showcase of his abilities. His first scene
where he is interacting with his family is hilariously awkward, with him trying
to do the play-acting that parents often do around younger kids but coming
across more like “I’m acting as hard as I can!” without a hint of irony. He
gets a nice shouty moment near the end where he essentially calls these girls
exactly what they are, but it isn’t nearly as hammy enough to justify sitting
through the rest of the film to get to it. Aside from him, the family isn’t
really in the movie long enough to be worthy of note, so that leaves us with
the two main girls. Izzo and de Armas are decent actors, but they never come across
as that much of a threat in the intimidating sense. They do portray teen girls
pretty accurately, but then again, I’d mark that as a point against the film.
There is a special word that has a lot of power in the
English language. It is easily one of the more controversial swears that exist
and, while it is definitely used more frequently nowadays, it still holds some
sway in showing utter contempt. I don’t swear on this blog as much as I
probably should, given how much visceral hatred I have for some of the films I
discuss on here, but every so often I feel a need to use more colourful
language. This word in question is one I simply hate using because of how
vulgar it is, but there is nothing else that fits in the following sentence.
Genesis and Bel are two of the most irritating, pretentious Valley Girl cunts
that I have had the misfortune to encounter all year, if not the last
several years.
They have all of one note for the entire film, that of
constant annoyance, and they never waver from that at any point during the
film. I immediately retract any and all statements I made in the Green Inferno
review about Eli Roth showing signs of improvement, as these two are the
embodiment of every atrocious writing trope Roth has ever put into his movies.
The traditional argument is that these characters are supposed to be loathsome,
and while I congratulate Roth on that front, that doesn’t instantly make them
watchable. I’ve talked before about the trend in horror films to make the main
characters thoroughly unlikeable so that no tears are shed when bad things
happen to them. Well, that applies to the main villains as well; it may provide
an easy means to be against the bad guys, but that doesn’t mean that we will
want to see them on screen for any length of time. Hell, the one likeable character in this mess, who
acts like he has a brain in his head, is killed off in quite idiotic fashion
after only a few moments of relief.
There might be a certain subtext that can be read into the
film’s events, particularly about the reason why the girls targeted Evan in the first place. Maybe it’s trying
to make commentary on the double standards between the sexes when it comes to
sexual histories: Men can sleep around all they want, but women are shunned for
doing the same thing. As such, this is meant to show how easy it is to paint
men as being the sexual aggressors and women as the victims, regardless of what
the reality is. Ignoring what kind of person it would take to feel the need to
commentate on that in this fashion (hint: emotionally stunted man-child), this
is just following the age-old stereotype that all men will accept whatever sex
they are given. Basically, the same brain-rottingly stupid argument that is the
reason why male rape is largely treated as a joke nowadays. Much like how
Stephanie Meyer being a woman doesn’t excuse her for how misogynistic her
writing is, Eli Roth being a man doesn’t excuse him for how misandristic this
film is.
Even if this premise did hold any kind of water as some kind
of satire, the amount of plot holes and just plain stupid character actions
involved in the girls’ plan means that, in the real world, what actually took
place would become public knowledge and evidence would prove that Evan was the
victim. So, by film’s end, all of the incessantly exasperating dialogue, the
torture scenes, the man rape (which at least isn’t meant to be taken as a joke…
yay?); none of it amounts to anything. If there was an actual point to all of
this, then maybe the contents could have been salvaged, but instead it just
ends in a damp squib and a painfully forced attempt to end on a slightly humorous note. This might be the first time that I have felt the urge not to read deeper into a film; with how
infuriating the surface is, I just don’t fucking care anymore.
All in all, this is nauseating in how vapid it is. The
acting and writing show off every reason why someone should smack the keyboard
out of Eli Roth’s hands, as it highlights his ‘talent’ for creating
unfathomable vexatious characters who do unbelievably idiotic things, all under
the guise of delivering a ‘point’. If you’re lucky enough to like Roth’s style
of storytelling, then this should be just fine. If not, avoid like the vacuous
skid mark that it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment