The plot: On a routine search of a dead body found near a local mosque, FBI agent Ray (Chiwetel Ejiofor) is shocked to discover that the victim is the daughter of his colleague Jess (Julia Roberts). Thirteen years later, Ray thinks that he has found the person responsible (Joe Cole) after he escaped from them last time. However, both Jess and district attorney Claire (Nicole Kidman) doubt that it is really him. As Ray continues to hunt down the culprit, memories and feelings connected to the events all those years ago start to come back up and, in the process, the need for justice may consume them all.
Okay, even with my joking about the casting of Julia
Roberts, this is an excellently acted film. Chiwetel Ejiofor is phenomenal, as
he translates the character’s obsession and distraught reactions into a
powerful performance. Julia Roberts is far more sobering than the rather
misleading trailer would have audiences believe, echoing Ejiofor’s drive while
channelling her own determination and despair as well. The rest of the cast are
very effective as well, with Joe Cole being very unnerving as Marzin, Dean Norris
being a good supporting man as Bumpy, Michael Kelly being a complete prick as
Reg and Alfred Molina bringing the goods as well as the former DA Morales.
The big chink in the chain, though, is Nicole Kidman, which is honestly surprising. Not because she’s all that great an actress herself, as she has never really impressed in films past. No, this is surprising because she is responsible for easily the best scene in the entire film. When she ends up confronting Marzin herself, it is an amazing thing to witness and I won’t dare spoil why. Outside of that one scene however, she constantly falls behind the rest of the cast in terms of capabilities. This isn’t helped by the fact that, despite being one of the three main characters, she is mostly relegated to being the love interest of Ray. Said romantic subplot is probably the worst handled part of the entire film, as its development is rather poor and its relevance to the overall story is minimal at best.
Beyond just the casting, probably the big thing that kept distracting me while watching the film is how the actors are aged when going from 2002 to 2015; in that, they honestly haven’t. All that has really been done is changing their hair styles: Kidman lets her locks down when she gets older, Norris loses some hair, Ejiofor gets some grey on the sides, etc. I’ll admit that it does enough to make it easy to distinguish between time periods, but it’s still jarring to see how little these people age in thirteen years. After having seen Reese Witherspoon pull it off flawlessly in Wild earlier this year, this feels subpar.
The big chink in the chain, though, is Nicole Kidman, which is honestly surprising. Not because she’s all that great an actress herself, as she has never really impressed in films past. No, this is surprising because she is responsible for easily the best scene in the entire film. When she ends up confronting Marzin herself, it is an amazing thing to witness and I won’t dare spoil why. Outside of that one scene however, she constantly falls behind the rest of the cast in terms of capabilities. This isn’t helped by the fact that, despite being one of the three main characters, she is mostly relegated to being the love interest of Ray. Said romantic subplot is probably the worst handled part of the entire film, as its development is rather poor and its relevance to the overall story is minimal at best.
Beyond just the casting, probably the big thing that kept distracting me while watching the film is how the actors are aged when going from 2002 to 2015; in that, they honestly haven’t. All that has really been done is changing their hair styles: Kidman lets her locks down when she gets older, Norris loses some hair, Ejiofor gets some grey on the sides, etc. I’ll admit that it does enough to make it easy to distinguish between time periods, but it’s still jarring to see how little these people age in thirteen years. After having seen Reese Witherspoon pull it off flawlessly in Wild earlier this year, this feels subpar.
When it comes to the main
story, however, this film enters into its strides. While the themes of revenge
are well-handled and the characterisation that results from it is portrayed
nicely, it works even better when put into the film’s historical context;
specifically, the attitudes of the U.S. post-9/11. The plot as shown in 2002
spotlights a police department that sees counter-terrorism as the most
important thing in the world, to the point where it is worth defying all other
forms of law enforcement in order to preserve. I have maintained that
subjectivity is near-impossible in my
line of work, because it is essentially built on the idea that everyone is a
critic with their own perspectives. However, that doesn’t mean that it isn’t
important in other areas, and law enforcement is most certainly one of them.
As we watch Ray, Jess and Claire frantically trying to justify their own actions in terms of bringing Mazrin to justice, it becomes clear that they most certainly are not looking out for justice anymore; they want bloody satisfaction. Considering what measures are being taken by the higher-ups in order to protect their snitch who could bring down a sleeper cell operating in the nearby mosque, it’s not that difficult to draw a similar conclusion. Of course, while the two ideas work great as parallels, things start to become muddled once they intersect. It is an extremely uncomfortable question to ponder if it is worth protecting a murderous rapist to bring down a cell that could potentially kill hundreds, if not thousands, and I most certainly won’t try and do so here. I may have been getting too political of late, but even I know when to step down from my soap-box. At this stage, I’ll just leave it at how almost anything can become justified once something becomes personal and this film does a great job of portraying that.
As we watch Ray, Jess and Claire frantically trying to justify their own actions in terms of bringing Mazrin to justice, it becomes clear that they most certainly are not looking out for justice anymore; they want bloody satisfaction. Considering what measures are being taken by the higher-ups in order to protect their snitch who could bring down a sleeper cell operating in the nearby mosque, it’s not that difficult to draw a similar conclusion. Of course, while the two ideas work great as parallels, things start to become muddled once they intersect. It is an extremely uncomfortable question to ponder if it is worth protecting a murderous rapist to bring down a cell that could potentially kill hundreds, if not thousands, and I most certainly won’t try and do so here. I may have been getting too political of late, but even I know when to step down from my soap-box. At this stage, I’ll just leave it at how almost anything can become justified once something becomes personal and this film does a great job of portraying that.
All in all, my opinion on this might be helped by my unfamiliarity with the original Argentinian
film of the same name. However, given the ideological differences between the
settings of the two films, I have enough reason to think that this film can
stand on its own and it damn well does. The acting is outstanding, with even
Nicole Kidman being given a chance to shine which she takes full advantage of,
the atmosphere is thick with intrigue and tragedy, and the writing not only
works in the moment as a study into the want for revenge and its more political
implications, but it carries enough subtleties to work on a Fridge Brilliance
level as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment