I should mention right at the start that I’ll be looking at
the Extended Cut, which has a completely different opening and ending to
the theatrical release. Since they were both the same price for rental at the
time of viewing, and this year has already proven me wrong on at least one
other director’s cut, I figured I might as well check out the Extended Cut. Put
simply, the key difference here has to do with the characters behind the scenes
for the titular Escape Rooms, namely James Frain as the puzzlemaker for the
shadowy Minos corporation, and Isabelle Fuhrman of Orphan fame as his captive
daughter. I’m admittedly going off of plot synopses to parse out the
differences between versions, but given the information available, I honestly
think the changes made were for the better. Partly because they maintain a
personalised touch to all of the escape rooms shown in the main film, and
partly because any excuse to have Fuhrman on-screen is worth pursuing.
Now, as much as I could extoll how compelling the story of
Fuhrman’s Claire is, her connection to the escape rooms, and how she adds to
the overall theme of banding together to survive (as opposed to the ‘sole
survivor’ theme of the first film), that would all fly in the face of how this
is still a very niche thriller for a very specific kind of audience. And those
who fall outside of that definition won’t care a whiff for the extra fluff if
they aren’t already on-board for the patently ludicrous puzzle design and
breakneck pace, the bulk of which remains identical regardless of the version
seen.