Write a story about two people in a room. For the entirety
of that story, these two never leave that room. There is nothing in it except
for themselves. There is nothing that they can do except interact, either
through basic conversation or something more… physical. There might be flashbacks to their lives before entering that room, but otherwise, this is where the story takes place. This one room with just two people in it.
Sounds boring, right? Well, it’s one of the more
classic tests of great filmmaking: Take that conceit and make it interesting.
And writer/director Vincenzo Natali, when he isn’t making genre flicks about bioengineered
rape shenanigans (seriously, Splice is a weird movie), has made a career out of
pushing that idea to its breaking point. From the theological twists of Cube to
the existential dramedy Nothing, whose most memorable scenes show two people in
a void of bright white nothingness, he knows how to do a lot with very little
scenery. If there was any Stephen King story he'd choose to adapt, of course
it’d be this one.
This is where the acting ends up bulking up the tension and
dread of the premise. Laysla De Oliveira and Avery Whitted as a sister and
brother duo who initially get stuck in the thick of the thicket work nicely,
even with how intentionally and unintentionally incestuous the text can
get at times, Will Buie Jr. as the child Tobin gives the film some very
intensive bookends, Harrison Gilbertson as the father of the sister’s child
works alright with the admitted little he gets, and Patrick Wilson… is all
kinds of fun. He’s basically the one who succumbs to the weird shit happening,
and as he grows more and more unhinged, he ends up crystalizing some of the
script’s chewier ideas. I should mention that all of these actors have to work
against the bursts of character exposition they’re given, so it’s surprising
that they are as natural as they are here.
What the story boils down to, as far as my understanding at
least, is derived from Stephen King’s usual ruminations on religious faith,
extremism of that faith, and even a bit of the omniscience that is regularly
ascribed to the Almighty. The way that time as a concept gets flayed bare
within the story means that, as we get further into the running time, we see
that everyone involved has been in the grass before. And will be again. And
might very well be there alongside themselves somewhere in the Blair
Witch-esque mindfuck that is the grass. Every single decision they make,
whether it’s to fight against the forces within the grass or buckle down and
join them, has already been witnessed. And the ones chasing our characters have
seen every possibility. And they catch them. Every. Single. Time.
It’s definitely one of the creepier takes on contained
multiverse theory that I’ve seen in a movie, one bolstered by how it makes one
want to cry out “Where the hell am I supposed to go?!”, a question I often
associate with the labyrinthine task of following the advice of a greater being
who already knows all of your possible outcomes and which one you’ll ultimate
arrive at. Free will may have its sticking points, but it involves far less
headaches than predeterminism as a general rule. Add to that Wilson’s
character, a former gospel musician, and the very green-hued church across the
road from the maze of grass, and this feels like it gets what King was going
for in terms of theme.
It is definitely a grower, though, as it takes a bit of time
to get past the sensation that this is a premise that could only suffice as a
short film, something that struck me pretty quickly here. But as the characters
keep getting pressured, Wilson keeps getting nuttier, and the details of the
plot itself get crackier, I can’t say I didn’t enjoy it. Hell, once it reaches
the ending, it actually got me all tensed up, wanting the leads to survive this
mess. If it got me emotionally engaged with the characters, despite my
misgivings about the relative monotony of the setting, it must’ve done
something right.
No comments:
Post a Comment