Part of what I do here with these reviews is trying to put
singular films into a greater context. The wheres and whys that surround each
production can often help make sense of the product itself, for better or for
worse. And in the realms of American cinema, few directors can lay claim to
being such utter fonts of cinematic context as Orson Welles.
Film as any of us know it simply doesn’t make sense without
considering his contribution to the art, something that can easily be taken for
granted when looking at his seminal classics in today’s light. From the
revolutionary visuals of Citizen Kane to the ground-breaking editing of F For
Fake to the character wizardry of Chimes At Midnight, his work has influenced so much of what would come afterwards that it's frankly staggering. He is one of the few
filmmakers I can recall where it feels necessary to separate entertainment
value from the legacy of the art itself. This film, a posthumous completion of
one of the many productions Welles never lived to see completed, is no
exception.
Of course, during the 1970’s in American cinema, that is
precisely what was going on. The olden days of Hollywood had given way to the
New: New creatives, New visual techniques, New styles of narrative. It serves
as one of the biggest cultural shifts of the last century, one that gave birth
to a seemingly-endless list of directors, writers and actors who would shape
the face of Hollywood cinema, if not international cinema, forever after. And
knowing how much Welles was starting to question even himself during this time, re-entering America after years of exile in Europe,
it’s hard not to see why this particular narrative would spring to mind. The
film itself is full of the privacy invasion and critic deconstruction that
define this era of Welles’ career, and through that, we see a creative showing
worry about his longevity in this new age.
It is because of this that this film’s recent completion
actually ends up giving this even more
agency as a piece of art, seeing as we are currently on the cusp of another
cinematic revolution. We are also starting to shift away from the traditional
Hollywood system, turning from the multiplex to the ever-furthering advances in
home entertainment technology. It’s a transition that has already seen some
successes, like many of the acclaimed Netflix films and series that have come
out, and some downfalls, like many of Hollywood’s shocking attempts to catch
back up with them young people today. There’s a reason why The Emoji Movie is
still as hated as ever, and will likely go down as a watershed moment of just
how bad the system can get in modern times: It is textbook trying and failing to appeal to younger audiences.
It is through all this that this film manages to reach a
seemingly-unintended poignancy. I say “seemingly” because Welles is one of
those creative who had an almost sixth sense in regards to his own work, as he
would show not long after shooting this film with F For Fake. Similar to Kurt Cobain: Montage Of Heck, it shows a creative mind pondering on the futility of
their own legacy, wondering if what they have to offer the world would survive
the changing tides. Also much like Montage Of Heck, because of the time and
care that went into its crafting, it allows the creative to speak on the record
while also giving a retroactive pat on the back that their legacy is in good
hands. Because quite frankly, nothing other than good hands could’ve made this
film work so damn well after all this time.
No comments:
Post a Comment